|
Auditor General Thomas H. McTavish, C.P.A. Auditor General |
|
|
|
|
| INTRODUCTION | This compliance audit covers the Michigan Higher Education Assistance Authority (MHEAA) administration of private colleges' competitive scholarship and tuition grant programs for the fall 1995-96 academic period, adult part-time grant and Michigan work-study programs for the 1994-95 academic period, and degree reimbursements for degrees conferred during fiscal year 1994-95. |
|---|---|
| AUDIT PURPOSE | This audit was conducted as part of the constitutional responsibility of the Office of the Auditor General and was required by Act 154, P.A. 1995, the annual appropriations act for State institutions of higher education and certain State purposes related to education. |
| BACKGROUND | MHEAA, through the Department of Treasury, is responsible for administering private college competitive scholarships, tuition grants, adult part-time grants, Michigan work-study awards, and degree reimbursements. For the 1995-96 academic period, the Legislature appropriated $30.5 million for competitive scholarships and $53.5 million for tuition grants. For the 1994-95 academic period, it appropriated $2.3 million for adult part-time grants and $6.4 million for Michigan work-study awards. For fiscal year 1995-96, the Legislature also appropriatd $5.5 million for general, nursing, and allied health degrees and $4.1 million for dental degrees conferred during fiscal year 1994-95. |
| AUDIT OBJECTIVES AND CONCLUSIONS |
Audit Objective: To determine that students at private
colleges receiving competitive scholarships, tuition grants, adult
part-time grants, and Michigan work-study awards met eligibility
requirements stated in the enabling legislation and the
appropriations act.
Conclusion: In general, students at private colleges receiving competitive scholarships, tuition grants, adult part-time grants, and Michigan work-study awards met eligibility requirements. However, we noted instances in which students did not meet eligibility requirements or the awards were not posted to the student accounts (Findings 1 through 3). In addition, MHEAA should issue guidance to the private colleges and universities which requires identification other than a driver license as primary documentation to determine a student's residency status (Finding 4). MHEAA should also establish procedures for conducting an overall review of grant and award recipients when audit testing results in high error rates at particular private colleges and universities (Finding 5). Audit Objective: To determine that the private colleges appropriately accounted for adult part-time grant and Michigan work-study funds. Conclusion: The private colleges appropriately accounted for these funds. Audit Objective: To determine that the private colleges requested reimbursement for only eligible degrees earned by Michigan residents. Conclusion: The private colleges generally requested reimbursement for only eligible degrees earned by Michigan residents. |
| AUDIT SCOPE | Our audit scope was to examine, at 10 of the 48 private colleges and
universities, selected records supporting the competitive scholarships
and tuition grants awarded for the fall 1995 academic period, adult
part-time grants, and Michigan work-study funds awarded to students
attending private colleges in Michigan during the 1994-95 academic
period, and degrees conferred during fiscal year 1994-95 and submitted
for reimbursement in fiscal year 1995-96. Our audit was conducted in
accordance with Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller
General of the United States and, accordingly, included such tests of
the records and such other auditing procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances.
The private colleges included in our audit were:
|
| AGENCY RESPONSES AND PRIOR AUDIT FOLLOW-UP | Our report contains 5 findings and 6 corresponding recommendations.
MHEAA agreed with our recommendations and indicated that steps would be
taken to implement all of them.
In response to our prior audit, MHEAA, in conjunction with the private colleges and universities, resolved all but two of the prior audit exceptions. These exceptions are included in this report as a repeat recommendation for Finding 1. |
|
|
|